Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Garvie v. Bennett
as 24-2965
Petitioner:
EUGENE BRIAN GARVIE
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Ewalan v. Washington Department of Corrections, et al.
as 24-2918
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROTHWELL, Sergeant G-Unit B-Side, DICKERSON, Sergeant and others
Corbray v. Bennett
as 24-2504
Petitioner:
DENNIS D CORBRAY and Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
John Demos, Jr.In re: John Demos, Jr.
as 23-3020
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN R. DEMOS, JR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT STAFFORD CREEK CORRECTIONS CENTER
Rogers v. Haynes
as 23-3037
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARYL ROGERS
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05773
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Allen Cook
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Wentworth, Leigh Gilliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Phillips v. Jason Bennett
as 23-35430
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAN A. PHILLIPS
Respondent / Appellee:
JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Correctional Center
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00874
Plaintiff:
Jerry George Wood Jr.
Respondent:
Jason Bennett, Superintendent, Stafford creek Correction Center and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Griffin v. Jason Bennett, et al
as 23-35221
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL RYAN GRIFFIN
Respondent:
ROBERT FERGUSON
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD HAYNES, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center and JASON BENNETT, Superintendent, Stafford Creek Corrections Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
