Cases 1 - 10 of 255
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01234
Petitioner:
Anthony Kelley
Respondent:
Andre Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Robertson (PS) v. Stancil
as 1:2024cv01203
Petitioner:
Lonnie Ray Robertson
Respondent:
Moses Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stancil
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
NORMAN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Giron (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Jose S. Giron
Defendant:
Stancil and Jeremiah Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Stancil
as 24-1139
Petitioner:
GARY L. BALDWIN
Respondent:
MOSES STANCIL, C.D.O.C. Executive Director
Garza (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Albert Garza
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Brekke and Rasor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00799
Petitioner:
James E. Frantz
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
