Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Windsor v. Huber et al
as 1:2011cv02326
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Defendant:
Christopher Huber , Sally Quillian Yates, William S. Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Windsor v. Thrash et al
as 1:2011cv02027
Defendant:
Thomas Woodrow Thrash , Christopher Huber , William S. Duffey and others
Plaintiff:
William M. Windsor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Donald Jones v. William Pryor, et al
as 10-16779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. PRYOR, ED CARNES, ALAN J. BAVERMAN and others
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
Jones v. Pryor et al
as 3:2010cv02750
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Ed Carnes, Alan J. Baverman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Galyean vs. One West FSB
as 2:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
Stanley Marcus Galyean
Defendant:
One West FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prescott et al v. Black et al
as 2:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Susan H. Black, Stanley F. Birch, Stanley Marcus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
THOMPSON v. MARCUS et al
as 2:2009cv04378
Plaintiff:
GAIL THOMPSON
Defendant:
STANLEY MARCUS and JOHN HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prescott et al v. Tjoflat et al
as 2:2009cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Gerald B. Tjoflat, United States of America, Joel F. Dubina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
