Cases 41 - 50 of 181
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DUNCAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01350
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
STANTON DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jenkins v. Anderson et al
as 1:2019cv00700
Defendant:
Village of Lincolnshire, Mary E. Stanton, Greg Duffy and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest R. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Christopher Stanton v. Sandra Troxel, et al
as 18-2605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. STANTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA TROXEL, Case Worker/Counselor and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Christopher Stanton v. Indiana Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 18-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. STANTON
Defendant - Appellee:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANDRA TROXEL, Case Worker/Counselor
Winchester v. Illinois Republican Party et al
as 3:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Winchester
Defendant:
Illinois Republican Party , Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sillas v. Lorea et al
as 3:2018cv01021
Plaintiff:
Stanton E. Sillas
Defendant:
C/O Lorea, Mark A. Burton and Robert C. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANTON v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2018cv00200
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORR. COMMISSIONER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER A. STANTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00137
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SANDRA TROXEL
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A. STANTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
