Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cook v. Stanton et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
Brent W. Cook
Defendant:
M E Stanton, Detective Gray, Sheriff Alisa Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Uniglobal Pension Planning, Inc. v. Benchmark Retirement Plan Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00788
Plaintiff:
Uniglobal Pension Planning, Inc.
Defendant:
Benchmark Retirement Plan Services, Inc. , Paul G. Masser , Steven K. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamar v. Ebert
as 2:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Derek Stanton LaMar
Defendant:
Paul Ebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia
as 3:2011cv00620
Plaintiff:
Stacy Rogers , Sean Adams , Reuben T. Albright and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Buckshaw v. Security Public Storage et al
as 1:2011mc00015
Plaintiff:
John J. Buckshaw
Defendant:
Security Public Storage, Richard B. Kaufman, Manual E. Capsalis and others
Sinioukov v. SRA International, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00447
Plaintiff:
Andrei Sinioukov
Defendant:
SRA International, Inc. , Ernst Volgenau , John W. Barter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stanton v. Huawei Technologies, Co., LTD.
as 1:2011cv00297
Plaintiff:
Greg Stanton
Defendant:
Huawei Technologies, Co., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Stanton et al
as 3:2008cv00518
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Davis
Defendant:
C/O Stanton, Brooks and DaWhite
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rogers v. Stanton Hill Company et al
as 1:2007cv01299
Plaintiff:
James Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Stanton Hill Company, Aaron R. Patten and John Ward
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
