Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Metoyer v. Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
as 2:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Metoyer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation Welfare Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hooks v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2023cv01000
Petitioner:
Ronald K Hooks
Respondent:
Starbucks Corporation
Intervenor:
Workers United
Mallouk et al v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Mallouk, Alfredo Rodriguez Perez and Arjun Dhawan
Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz et al
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Defendant:
Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corporation, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Balmuccino LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv01501
Plaintiff:
Balmuccino, LLC and Balmuccino LLC
Defendant:
Starbucks Inc and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Starbucks Corporation v. Does 1-10
as 2:2022cv01481
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation, a Washington corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Spencer v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Richard Spencer
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cohen v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00983
Defendant:
John Does I-X and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Starbucks Corporation v. Choice Traditions, Inc
as 2:2018cv01070
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Choice Traditions, Inc. and Choice Traditions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taza Systems LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2017mc00003
Plaintiff:
Taza Systems LLC
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
