Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 126,211
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04161
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Kazanas v. Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: Gregory Alan Kazanas
Defendant: Department of Corrections
Interested Party: State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner: Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent: Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Approx. $73,212.71, et al.,
as 2:2024mc00204
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $73,212.71 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009403, Approximately $13,738.24 seized from Preferred Bank account number 23009438, Approximately $1,378,783.42 seized from UBS AG account number GE 46907 and others
Claimant: Run It Up, Inc. and Won It All, Inc.
United States of America v. Essenfeld
as 24-3185
Defendant: THEODORE E. ESSENFELD and Theordore E. Essenfeld
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Azcarate v. Williams, et al.
as 24-3174
Petitioner: RAY ANTONIO AZCARATE
Respondent: BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
United States of America v. Curry
as 24-3169
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID ELMO CURRY
United States of America v. Aslanian
as 24-3172
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARTHUR RAFFY ASLANIAN
Saintillus v. United States of America
as 24-3167
Petitioner: CHALONER SAINTILLUS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Weems v. Burton, et al.
as 24-3179
Petitioner: ZIR ION WEEMS
Respondent: ROBERT BURTON and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?