Cases 21 - 30 of 8,175
Garrett v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Justin Garrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griggs v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
David Earl Griggs
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Riner v. State Farm Fire and Casulty Company
as 2:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Riner
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casulty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
as 2:2024mc04020
Not Yet Classified:
In the Matter of the Appointment of Johnathan S. Ross as United States Attorney
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08012
Petitioner:
DeAnte Marquise Ford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
