Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Albert Thomas v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 19-13756
Defendant / Appellee: GARFIELD HAMMONDS, JR., BOBBY K. WHITWORTH, TIMOTHY E. JONES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALBERT THOMAS
Thomas v. Georgia State Board of Pardon and Paroles
as 1:2019cv23777
Plaintiff: Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant: Georgia State Board of Pardon and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant: Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff: Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 7:2019cv00088
Defendant: JACQUELINE BUNN, TERRY E BARNARD, BRIAN OWENS and others
Plaintiff: QUINCEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01987
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Respondent: State Board of Pardons and Paroles and State of Georgia
Petitioner: Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daker v. Deal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00365
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Walsh v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2018cv04469
Defendant: Jacqueline Bunn, Braxton C. Cotton, Brian Owens and others
Plaintiff: William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUFUS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
as 3:2018cv00111
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS
Respondent: STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?