Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Castaneda v. State of Nevada
as 24-50328
Plaintiff: Rudy Castaneda
Defendant: State of Nevada, Does 1-5, Inclusive, Joni Abraham and others
State of Missouri v. Biden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-30445
Plaintiff / Appellee: State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant / Appellant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vivek H. Murthy, Xavier Becerra and others
Amicus Curiae: Children's Health Defense, Leland Stanford Junior University, Electronic Frontier Foundation and others
Moates v. State of North Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00772
Plaintiff: Michael Moates
Defendant: State of North Carolina, State of Texas, State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff: Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant: CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Castaneda v. State of Nevada et al
as 5:2022cv01353
Plaintiff: Rudy Castaneda
Defendant: State of Nevada and Does 1-5, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff: Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant: Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae: Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Texas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00796
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: State of Texas
Intervenor Defendant: Erick Graham, Jeff Tuley, Mistie Sharp and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Massachusetts, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Petitioner: Felipe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Braidwood Management Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00283
Plaintiff: John Kelley, Kelley Orthodontics, Joel Starnes and others
Defendant: Steven T. Mnuchin, Alex M. Azar II, Eugene Scalia and others
Amicus Curiae: State of Illinois, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of Texas v. USA Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-10011
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Intervenor: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF IOWA, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO, 483 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBAL NATIONS, ILYA SOMIN and others
Not Classified By Court: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?