Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Sakima El Bey v. Lieutenant Davi
as 11-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall, a/k/a Iban Salih El Bey Sakim
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT DAVIS, FIREBAUGH, Officer, JOE SHAW, Mayor, City of Lancaster and others
Stanley Ballenger v. J. Dale Owen
as 11-1599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY MARK BALLENGER, a/k/a Stanley Mark Ballenger, former #151010
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DALE OWENS, L, CPL, State Trooper, SC Hwy Patrol Ace Team, JEFFREY G. STEVENS, L, CPL, State Trooper, C. NICHOLAS LAVERY, Esquire and others
Bey v. Davis et al
as 0:2011cv01026
Plaintiff:
Sakima Iban Salih El Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant Davis, Officer Firebaugh, Lancaster Police Dep Chief of Police Harlean Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00066
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Taylor v. State Of SC et al
as 1:2010cv03065
Petitioner:
Alex D Taylor
Respondent:
State Of SC and Jon Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harley v. State Of SC et al
as 3:2010cv02296
Petitioner:
Thomas Harley
Respondent:
State Of SC, County of Orangeburg, Roger Heaton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00911
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Green v. State Of SC et al
as 6:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Harold Green
Defendant:
State Of SC, County of Berkeley, Family Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brian Peltier v. Jobe Metts
as 09-1173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN E. PELTIER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOBE C. METTS, MD, MUSC, TENET SOUTH CAROLINA, d/b/a East Cooper Regional Medical Center and others
Sweat v. State Of SC
as 0:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Chuck Sweat
Respondent:
State Of SC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
