Cases 1 - 6 of 6
K.C. v. THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, et al
as 1:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
K. C., NATHANIEL CLAWSON, BETH CLAWSON and others
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE MEDICAL LICENSING BOARD OF INDIANA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL LICENSING AGENCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, State of Alabama, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Interested Party:
GENDERNEXUS, INC. and GENDER EXPANSIVE KIDS & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Djedi Order v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
DJEDI ORDER and Heru Spencer
Defendant:
State of Montana, State Of Florida, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Redmond v. Viera et al
as 3:2021cv00720
Defendant:
Brenda M Viera, State of Utah, Vernice S. Ah-Ching - Trease and others
Plaintiff:
John H. Redmond, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Rust Rare Coin Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06872
Defendant:
Aleesha Rust Franklin, Rust Rare Coin Inc., Denise Gunderson Rust and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division of Securities
Not Yet Classified:
Jonathan O Hafen
Dawn Sherman v. Christopher Koch
as 09-1455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAWN S. SHERMAN, a minor, through ROBERT I. SHERMAN, her father and next friend, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER KOCH, State Superintendent of Education
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
