Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Downes v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv00240
Petitioner:
James R. Downes
Respondent:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stovall v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Stovall
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn, Cassandra Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer-El v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jerome Greer-El
Defendant:
State of Alabama, State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Leon Forniss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Agee v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Chris Agee
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Corrections Officer Culver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown, III
as 1:2014cv05497
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brown, III
Defendant:
Ron Davis, Tom Wheeler, Correctional Officer Lemos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2014cv00096
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Cynthia Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv00014
Petitioner:
Anthony Armstrong
Respondent:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
