Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Conkle v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00628
Plaintiff:
Norman Joseph Conkle, II
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson et al v. Allen et al
as 2:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
Albert Wilson, Rufus Barnes, David Brooks and others
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mccoy v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rico R. Mccoy
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, John Cummins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey v. Albright et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00993
Plaintiff:
Patricia Forest Bailey
Defendant:
Frank Albright, Troy King and State of Alabama, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dawson v. Alex City Work Release et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2008cv00946
Plaintiff:
Mark Dawson
Defendant:
Alex City Work Release, James Carlton and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phelps v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2007cv02133
Petitioner:
Lloyd Phelps
Respondent:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Orum v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00799
Plaintiff:
Katrina D. Orum
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Batson v. State of Alabama Department of Correctional Facilities
as 2:2007cv01038
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Batson
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Correctional Facilities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
