Cases 1 - 10 of 15
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
State of Minnesota ex rel. et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 0:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Minnesota ex rel. and Ken Elder
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
ABC
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. MBM Solutions L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv01833
Defendant:
John Doe, MBM Solutions L.L.C. doing business as Avada Health, Cliff and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Alaska, ex rel., State of California, ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National, et al
as 19-7025
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Schneider and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Laurence Schneider
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
United States of America v. Amgen, Inc.
as 17-1522
Plaintiff:
United States of America, and the States of Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of California, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D., State of Colorado, Ex Rel Daniel Coyne, M.D. and others
Appellant:
Daniel Coyne, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Amgen, Inc.
USA ex. re. Laurence Schneider, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-7003
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of California, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider, State of Delaware, ex rel. Laurence Robert Schneider and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Laurence Robert Schneider
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Chase Home Finance, LLC
United States of America v. Wells Fargo & Company
as 15-2449
Plaintiff:
State of New York, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, State of Delaware, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss, District of Columbia, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Bishop, Robert Krauss and United States of America, Ex Rel Paul Bishop, Ex Rel Robert Krauss
Defendant - Appellee:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and The Clearing House Association, L.L.C.
Movant:
Taxpayers Against Fraud Education Fund
United States of America ex rel. et al Nix v. United Biologics, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01486
Defendant:
United Biologics, LLC doing business as United Allergy Services formerly known as United Allergy Labs, United Allergy Labs, Decatur Pediatric Group, P.A. and others
Petitioner:
Bothwell Law Group, P.C., Mike Bothwell and Bothwell Bracker P.C.
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex rel., State of California ex rel., State of Colorado ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Olson, et al. v. Fairview Health Services of Minnesota, et al.
as 0:2013cv02607
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Olson , State of Minnesota, ex rel. and United States of America, ex rel.
Defendant:
Fairview Health Services of Minnesota and University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
