Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Mellott v. DiCiolla et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
William Howard Mellott, II
Defendant:
Magistrate Ronald J. DiCiolla and State's Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Lovett et al
as 3:2023cv00214
Petitioner:
Hannibal Moore
Respondent:
S. Lovett, United States Attorney General and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Slade v. Heckard
as 5:2022cv00510
Petitioner:
Garland Slade
Respondent:
Katina Heckard, Federal Bureau of Prison and United States Attorney Genral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Feather-Gorbey v. Heckard et al
as 5:2022cv00183
Petitioner:
Tsunomi Khan (Chief) Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden Heckard, Governor Office WVa., State Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Albers v. Adams et al
as 3:2021cv00101
Petitioner:
David Scott Albers
Respondent:
P. Adams, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kilgore-Bey v. United States Attorney General William Barr
as 5:2019cv00309
Petitioner:
Minister-Cleveland Winston Kilgore-Bey
Respondent:
United States Attorney General William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Flores v. United States Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv14055
Petitioner:
Eric Flores
Respondent:
United States Attorney General and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
