Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Williams v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50061
Plaintiff:
Travionte Williams
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Dr. J. Chess, Dr. M. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Doll et al
as 3:2024cv50012
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Crenshaw
Defendant:
David A. Doll, J. Hanley, Michele Grimaldi-Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
. Maloney, . Renfro, . Geotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stein v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03937
Plaintiff:
Daniel Robert Stein
Defendant:
Lake County Jail and Wellpath Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Walter v. Reimer, et al.
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Defendant:
Mrs. Reimer, Reed Richardson, J. Achterberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. PRETORIS et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
PRETORIS, SERVIZZI, STEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw v. Vidal et al
as 3:2021cv50149
Defendant:
J. J., Thomas A. Lilien, Joseph McGraw and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donelson v. U.S. of America et al
as 1:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Police Officers John Doe, Hugh Hurwitz, Officer Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith, Walter v. Pugh, Jeffrey et al
as 3:2019cv00947
Defendant:
T. Brunnerk, Mrs. Reimer, Sgt. Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
