Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hamilton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2021cv00740
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hamilton
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04167
Defendant:
Chuck Gilchrist, Brent Fluke, Rebecca Schieffer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANG et al v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2019cv01241
Defendant:
ASHLEY GORODETZER, KATHARINE SULLIVAN, UNNAMED OVW GRANTEES AND VAWA COODINATORS and others
Plaintiff:
WEIH STEVE CHANG and GORDON GENE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton, et al v. CIR
as 19-9000
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHANIE HAMILTON and VINCENT C. HAMILTON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Zacharias v. South Dakota State Prison et al
as 4:2017cv04065
Plaintiff:
Chris Zacharias
Defendant:
South Dakota State Prison, Bob Dooley and Stephanie Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale et al v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2015cv04103
Plaintiff:
James Irving Dale, Brian Michael Holzer, Michael Eugene Koch and others
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Robert Dooley, Joshua Klimek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2014cv07224
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hamilton and Joseph Hamilton
Defendant:
General Motors L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton et al v. General Motors, LLC
as CO/1:14-cv-02219
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hamilton and Joseph Hamilton
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Hamilton et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2014cv02219
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hamilton and Joseph Hamilton
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Southern Insurance Company v. Hayslett et al
as 4:2009cv01850
Plaintiff:
American Southern Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tamika Hayslett, Barbara Hamilton, Naketa Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
