Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Deanthony Jackson, et al v. Stephen Whyte, et al
as 26-11206
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY A. JACKSON and ROBERT L. DAVIS
Defendant:
STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE, JOHNATHEN GLOVER, LARRY EGER and others
Deanthony Jackson v. Stephen Whyte, et al
as 26-10871
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY A. JACKSON
Defendant:
STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE, JOHNATHEN GLOVER, LARRY EGER and others
George v. Kaufman Police Department et al
as 6:2025cv00095
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathew George
Defendant:
Kaufman Police Department and Rowdy Meirs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Kaufman Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv02460
Defendant:
Rowdy Meirs and Kaufman Police Department
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathew George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
George v. Kaufman Police Department et al
as 9:2024cv00186
Defendant:
Kaufman Police Department and Rowdy Meirs
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathew George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Dusnik et al
as 8:2022cv02605
Plaintiff:
Charlie Carter, III
Defendant:
Ashley Dusnik, Ed Brodsky, Anne Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorendzo Holte v. Department of Revenue, et al
as 22-11851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHARLES DENTON, STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE and others
Holte v. Department of Revenue et al
as 8:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Charles Denton, Stephen Mathew Whyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STANSFIELD et al v. MINUTE MAID COMPANY et al
as 4:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
ANDREW E STANSFIELD and MICHAEL STEPHEN MATHEWS
Defendant:
MINUTE MAID COMPANY and COCA-COLA COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathews v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mathews
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
