Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Stericycle, Inc. v. Simota et al
as 1:2016cv04782
Plaintiff:
Stericycle, Inc.
Defendant:
Donald Simota , Dana Sullivan and Chad Van Houten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray I. Wellner, M.D., P.C. et al v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Murray I. Wellner, M.D., P.C. and Harry Hameroff
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiger Clinic, Inc. v. Stericycle, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03781
Plaintiff:
Tiger Clinic, Inc.
Defendant:
Stericycle Inc. , Stericycle Specialty Waste Solutions, Inc. and Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plastic Surgery Center Of St. Joseph, Inc. et al v. Stericycle, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plastic Surgery Center Of St. Joseph, Inc. and Michael D. DePriest
Defendant:
Stericycle Inc. and Stericycle Special Waste Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plastic Surgery Center Of St. Joseph, Inc. et al v. Stericycle, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv06026
Plaintiff:
Plastic Surgery Center Of St. Joseph, Inc. and Michael D. DePriest
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc. and Stericycle Special Waste Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiger Clinic, Inc. v. Stericycle, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Tiger Clinic, Inc.
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc., Stericycle Specialty Waste Solutions, Inc. and Stericycle Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frenchman v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02883
Plaintiff:
Kush Frenchman
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frenchman v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kush Frenchman
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fred M Fauvre v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 1:2015cv10285
Plaintiff:
Fred Fauvre
Defendant:
Stericycle Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fred M Fauvre v. Stericycle, Inc.
as 2:2015cv08414
Plaintiff:
Fred Fauvre
Defendant:
Stericycle, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
