Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rochester v. Federal Prison Director et al
as 3:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
Federal Prison Director, U. S. Atty. Gen., W. N. Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rivers v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Sterling R. Rivers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sterling v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02041
Plaintiff:
Maudine Sterling
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01683
Plaintiff:
Eula Evans
Defendant:
Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. , Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samsung et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01610
Plaintiff:
Michael Samsung and Son Truong
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Shelly Sterling, Jimmy Lovine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samsung et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00737
Plaintiff:
Michael Samsung and Son Truong
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Shelly Sterling, Jimmy Lovine and others
Askew et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2014cv02080
Plaintiff:
Sterling Askew and Sylvia Askew
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS , Toney Armstrong , Ned Aufdenkamp and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
