Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Cox v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Steve Cox
Defendant:
Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Gov Sisolak and Federal Defenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. NDOC\State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00575
Defendant:
Wickham, Scoggins, Mr. Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renard T. Polk, et al v. James Gibbons, et al
as 20-15005
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAID ELMAJZOUB, JEREMY A. CROZIER, TERRENCE D. BROTHERS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT BANNISTER, Medical Director, JAMES GIBBONS, Governor, ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENARD TRUMAN POLK
Cappel v. Cox
as 3:2018cv01537
Respondent:
Steve Cox
Petitioner:
Tammy A Cappel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farris et al v. D'Angelo et al
as 3:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
Eric Ottens and Laura Farris
Defendant:
Does 1 through 25, Steve Cox, Luke D'Angelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 oc
Cox v. Sorich et al
as 3:2016cv00591
Plaintiff:
Michael-Steve Cox
Defendant:
Hughes, Kaylee, Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Farris v. D'Angelo, et al
as 2:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Laura Farris
Defendant:
Luke D'Angelo , Steve Cox , AppTech Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LaZerre Stewart v. Steven Cox et al
as 2:2014cv02478
Respondent:
Steve Cox and The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
LaZerre Stewart
Cox v. ESP/Baker et al
as 3:2014cv00156
Petitioner:
Michael-Steve Cox
Respondent:
ESP/Baker and Nevada, State Of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. NDOC et al
as 3:2014cv00145
Defendant:
(Asst.)(Ms.) Luce, (Ms.) Young, (N) Margaret and others
Plaintiff:
Michael-Steve Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
