Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Thomas Smith v. Suzi Castelo, et al
as 23-35583
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD-ELMER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZI CASTELO, private capacity, LINDA MILLER SHEETS, private capacity, STEVE RAMSEY, private capacity and others
Smith v. Castelo et al
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Edward-Elmer Smith
Defendant:
Suzi Castelo, Linda Miller Sheets, Steve Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parmelee v. Dunnington et al
as 3:2011cv05771
Plaintiff:
Allan Parmelee
Defendant:
Tony Dunnington , Harlan Finch , Douglas Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01583
Plaintiff:
Allan Parmelee
Defendant:
Tony Dunnington , Harlan Finch , Douglas Waddington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Riggins v. Dan Pacholke, et al
as 11-35609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RIGGINS, AKA Dawud Halisi Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN PACHOLKE, TAMMY GWIN, C WHALEY, I&I and others
McCurry v. Crockett County Schools et al
as 1:2010cv01258
Plaintiff:
Mac McCurry
Defendant:
Crockett County Schools, Eddie Whitby, P. A. Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gronquist v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2010cv05374
Plaintiff:
Derek E. Gronquist
Defendant:
Faye Nicholas , Heather Annis , Paul Pemberton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Beatty et al
as 2:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Gary Barnett
Defendant:
Carl Beatty, Shermon Fultz, Headley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malik v. Pacholke et al
as 3:2010cv05147
Plaintiff:
Dawud Halisi Malik
Defendant:
Dan Pacholke, Tammy Gwin, C Whaley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaten v. Vail et al
as 3:2009cv05615
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lewis Chaten
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Washington State Department of Corrections, Steve Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
