Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Steven Morrison v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 12-4548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Van Ross v. Shelton, et al
as 12-3336
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN CRAIG VAN ROSS
Respondent - Appellee:
J.L. SHELTON and DEREK SCHMIDT, Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Slack v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03450
Petitioner:
Steven Craig Slack
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2012cv05828
Petitioner:
STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Ross v. Shelton et al
as 5:2012cv03143
Petitioner:
Steven Craig Van Ross
Respondent:
J. L. Shelton and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Thomas et al
as 3:2011cv01560
Petitioner:
Steven Craig Taylor
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moody v. Taylor et al
as 4:2010cv02032
Plaintiff:
Steven Craig Moody
Defendant:
Ronnie Taylor, W.R. Laws, CSD Sprint Telephone Relay Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Morrison v. Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 09-4585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
Steven Morrison v. Commonwealth of PA, et al
as 09-4584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, DA LANCASTER and ATTY GEN PA
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. MORRISON
as 2:2009cv03886
Petitioner:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Respondent:
STEVEN CRAIG MORRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
