Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Montgomery v. State Farm Insurance et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance, Rodney Wilson and Phoung V. Chu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Luther Montgomery v. James Stewart, et al
as 23-13652
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUTHER STEVEN MONTGOMERY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES STEWART, WALMART SUPERCENTER, CITY OF MOBILE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28559
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montgomery v. Stewart
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
James Stewart, Walmart Supercenter and Mobile Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Looney
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
Darlene Looney, Kevin Nelson, Daniel Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Stewart
as 1:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
James Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 2:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. Culum et al
as 1:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Steven Montgomery
Defendant:
M. Culum, J. Gamez, M. Pesce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
