Cases 1 - 10 of 65
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORAN v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ISSAC RANDOLPH, CARLA COAKLEY, MADISEN GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INMAN v. DEAKINS et al
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. INMAN, JR.
Defendant:
V. DEAKINS, KYRA HESS, A. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JACOBS v. BROUSE et al
as 1:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
Hugh A. Jacobs
Defendant:
Jordan Brouse and Aaron Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. STIGDON et al
as 1:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
LESLIE SHINELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
TERRY STIGDON, COURTNEY CROWE, ABIGAIL COPPOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUILMETTE v. STEVENSON et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS A. GUILMETTE
Defendant:
STEVENSON, BREWER, COAKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tanista L Stevenson
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Daniel J Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MAYBERRY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
PAUL MAYBERRY
Defendant:
SMITH, K. BOWILLA, HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
