Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. v. 2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
Defendant:
2.46 Acres in Dickson County, Tennessee, Donald L. Mixon, Willadean Ridley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Stevenson v. Frink
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
James Dominic Stevenson
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevenson v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
John E. Stevenson
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BiotronX, LLC et al v. Tech One Biomedical, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01035
Defendant:
Matthew Mincer and Tech One Biomedical, LLC
Plaintiff:
Scott Stevenson and Biotronx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moon v. Fulgam et al
as 3:2016cv01866
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
Michelle Fulgam, Phoenix Doris, Kenneth Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester et al v. K.H. Sharp et al
as 3:2015cv00730
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
K.H. Sharp, R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Nixon
as 3:2015cv00718
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Stevenson L. Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pearson v. Mooris et al
as 3:2015cv00578
Plaintiff:
Rashunus Pearson
Defendant:
Mindy Mooris, Martesha Johnson, Jamaal Boykin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Stevenson et al
as 3:2015cv00372
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R. Stevenson, B. Stirling, State S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
