Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., TRICIA PRETORTIOUS, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. STINE et al
as 1:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
STINE, CONTRACTED PARTY -- CENTURION, JUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MISHLER v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00781
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. MISHLER, JR.
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, M. MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STINE v. WATSON et al
as 2:2019cv00480
Defendant:
TIMOTHY TAYLOR, T. WATSON, GORE and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE et al v. KRUGER et al
as 2:2019cv00121
Defendant:
USP-TERRE HAUTE/HEALTH SERVICES DIVISION AND UNKNOWN STAFF (DOCTORS) AND (PHYSICIANS ASSISTANTS), A. SPRINGER, KRUGER and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE, SIDNEY GRIFFIN and DONALD NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STINE v. WATSON
as 2:2019cv00006
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
T. WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Justus v. Fort Wayne et al
as 1:2015cv00383
Plaintiff:
Robert Justus
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Jeff Ripley, Ben Springer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00431
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, MAJOR JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PINSON et al v. REYNOLDS et al
as 2:2013cv00428
Defendant:
DONALD DENNEY, JOHN DOE, MORRIS LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON and MIKEAL STINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evanston Insurance Company v. Howard et al
as 4:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Dustin K Howard, Rubiano's Inc , Sharon J Rubiano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
