Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 51 - 60 of 205
STONE v. HARVILL et al
as 1:2020cv01566
Plaintiff: BRANDON STONE
Defendant: KENNETH GANN, JOHN HARVILL and JO GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVID DEBOARD v. STONE CREST DEVELOPMENT, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00116
Defendant: BORDEN RIDGE, INC., F/K/A SDR DEVELOPMENT, INC., STONE CREST DEVELOPMENT, LLC and STEVE L. THIENEMAN
Plaintiff: DAVID DEBOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
STONE v. ZATECKY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01464
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, D. WYATT, MATTHEW FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone-Dunlap v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00392
Defendant: Warden
Petitioner: Eric Stone-Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01367
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01368
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STONE-DUNLAP v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv01327
Respondent: WARDEN
Plaintiff: ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stone-Dunlap v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00356
Respondent: Warden
Petitioner: Eric Stone-Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STONE v. SLOTT et al
as 1:2020cv01080
Defendant: DAVID M. SLOTT and AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL SERVICES MANAGEMENT AND RESCUE ROOTER
Plaintiff: ALFRED L. STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
PARADIGM LIVING CONCEPTS, LLC v. GREAT LAKES ACQUISITION, CORP. et al
as 1:2020cv01066
Defendant: AMY STONE, GREAT LAKES ACQUISITION, CORP. d/b/a GREAT LAKES CARING, a part of the ELARA CARING NETWORK, COMMUNITY HOME HEALTH NETWORK OF INDIANA, LLC, a part of the ELARA CARING NETWORK and others
Plaintiff: PARADIGM LIVING CONCEPTS, LLC d/b/a PARADIGM HEALTH and PARADIGM LIVING CONCEPTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?