Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lush, Stephen v. Strunk, Amy et al
as 3:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Amy Christine Strunk, Charles Honda Stovall, Michael Diven Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stovall v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STOVALL v. HOLCOMB
as 1:2020cv02306
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB
Plaintiff:
DANIEL STOVALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2019cv05196
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, John Doe 2, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
Precious Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stovall v. Agency Health Care Family Services Division of Child Support Division/Appeals and Offset Unit et al
as 3:2017cv50254
Plaintiff:
Kurt Douglas Stovall
Defendant:
Agency Health Care Family Services Division of Child Support Division/Appeals and Offset Unit, Felicia F. Norwood, Lauren E. Volanti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stovall v. McCarty et al
as 1:2017cv04762
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Amy McCarty, Ingrid Brown, Jamie Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kurt Stovall v. Daniel Grohen, et al
as 16-2245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT D. STOVALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL GROHEN, SONIA WILLEY and MARY B. SCHOLTEN
Stovall v. City of Chicago Department of Police et al
as 1:2016cv04004
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
City of Chicago Department of Police, Peter Delgado, Officer Janusonis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
