Cases 21 - 30 of 92
STOVALL v. CRICHFIELD et al
as 2:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. STOVALL
Defendant:
SHELBY CRICHFIELD, AIR MARK, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00874
Plaintiff:
Rolando L Diaz
Defendant:
Ron D Neal, C Frediarelli, G Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H.L. et al v. Porter County et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mezzacapo, H.L., A.G. and others
Defendant:
Porter County, Portage Police Department, Lightfoot Construction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKARD v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01164
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. AKARD
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DICK BROWN, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Justin D Williams and Justin Williams
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Peeples, Gregory Sheward and others
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
Trae T Thompson
Defendant:
Ron Neal, B Stovall and Josh Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Lucas
as 2:2021cv01465
Petitioner:
Jarrell D Stovall
Respondent:
Earnell Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Poole v. Neal et al
as 3:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Poole
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk, Josh Wallen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOVALL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2021cv02270
Petitioner:
DANIEL STOVALL
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
