Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Larkin v. Christie et al
as 1:2019cv01024
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Nueces County Sherriff, TX, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larkin v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2019cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Larkin
Defendant:
Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections, Assistant Superintendent of Security, Strafford County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reddy, et al v. Foster, et al
as 16-1432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY ROSE REDDY, SUE CLIFTON, JENNIFER ROBIDOUX and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH A. FOSTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire, D. CHRIS MCLAUGHLIN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Cheshire County, NH, SCOTT W. MURRAY, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Merrimack County, NH and others
Defendant:
THOMAS P. VELARDI, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Strafford County, NH and DERRY, NH
Reddy, et al v. Foster, et al
as 16-1432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY ROSE REDDY, SUE CLIFTON, JENNIFER ROBIDOUX and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH A. FOSTER, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of New Hampshire, D. CHRIS MCLAUGHLIN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Cheshire County, NH, SCOTT W. MURRAY, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Merrimack County, NH and others
Defendant:
PATRICIA LAFRANCE, TOM VELARDI, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Strafford County, NH, JAMES T. BOFFETTI and others
Maryea v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
as 1:2013cv00318
Defendant:
David Baggs, William Bryant, Robert Metcalf and others
Plaintiff:
Lynette Maryea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
