Cases 61 - 70 of 122
HOLMES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2016cv01434
Plaintiff:
WILFRED LEE HOLMES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, DAVID W. THOMAS, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. STATE OF NJ et al
as 1:2015cv05287
Plaintiff:
KENNETH COVINGTON
Defendant:
STATE OF NJ, CHRISTIE, STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALEEM-BEY v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2015mc00131
Plaintiff:
YAHYA SALEEM-BEY
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN KERRY, JOHN JAY HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Abraham Unger v. Maureen Sogluizzo, et al
as 15-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RABBI DR. ABRAHAM UNGER, PH.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE MAUREEN SOGLUIZZO, P.J.F.P., DANIEL PACILIO, Esq., CHIEF JUSTICE STUART RABNER and others
ADAMO v. JONES et al
as 2:2015cv01073
Plaintiff:
DAMARIS ADAMO
Defendant:
LINDA GRASSO JONES, LAWRENCE M. LAWSON, STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
ALINTOFF v. ESCANDON et al
as 2:2015cv01072
Plaintiff:
RACHAEL ALINTOFF
Defendant:
PAUL X. ESCANDON, BRYAN ALINTOFF, LINDA GRASSO JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
WOLF v. ESCALA et al
as 2:2014cv05985
Plaintiff:
KARIN WOLF
Defendant:
GERALD C. ESCALA, EDWARD J. CRANE , PETER VAN AULEN, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
UNGER, Ph.D. v. SOGLUIZZO, P.J.F.P. et al
as 2:2014cv04074
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM UNGER, PH.D.
Defendant:
MAUREEN P. SOGLUIZZO, P.J.F.P., DANIEL PACILIO, Esq. , STUART RABNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALLS v. SARKISIAN et al
as 2:2013cv04698
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SMALLS
Defendant:
BARRY SARKISIAN, HECTOR VELAZQUEZ, PETER BARISO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
QUINTANA v. NJ STATE et al
as 2:2013cv04302
Petitioner:
JOSE QUINTANA
Respondent:
NJ STATE, STUART RABNER, MICHAEL J. NELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
