Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Su v. MSRC, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
MSRC, LLC doing business as Mountain State Recovery Center, Joshua Galbraith and Joseph Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Huntley v. Acting Secretary Julie Su United States Department of Labor
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Chad D. Huntley
Defendant:
Acting Secretary Julie Su United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Su v. Professional Payroll Concepts Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00548
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Professional Payroll Concepts Inc. and doing business as Personnel Management of WV 401(K) Plan and Krista Chitwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Su v. MSES Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Julie A Su
Defendant:
MSES Consultants, Inc., Lawrence Rine and MSES INC. Employee Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Moser v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moser v. SFF Hazelton Warden
as 3:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moser v. SFF Hazelton Warden
as 5:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moser v. SFF Hazelton
as 3:2022cv00041
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moser v. USA
as 3:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Connie Su Moser
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
