Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Su Y v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Su Yang
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cortex v. Golden Star Supply Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02572
Defendant:
Golden Star Supply Inc., Golden Star Kitchen & Bath, Inc., Gina Young and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Cortex
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chenggui Hua et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service et al
as 2:2017cv04101
Defendant:
Kathy Baran, Nicholas Colucci, Jeh Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Chenggui Hua, Jianhua Sun, Lixin Yan and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Yang v. Berryhill
as 0:2017cv00686
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Su Yang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Zhing v. Holder
as 13-39
Petitioner:
Su Yang Zhing, AKA Suyan Jin and Jian-Min Yu
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Neal North v. China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02094
Defendant:
AEGIS Capital Corporation, Michael Askew, China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Neal North
Movant:
de Sejournet Funds
Colonel Nunzio Marabella v. China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03390
Defendant:
Michael Askew, China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc., Zhang Hongfeng and others
Plaintiff:
Colonel Nunzio Marabella
North v. China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00302
Plaintiff:
Neal North
Defendant:
China Intelligent Lighting & Electronics Inc., Li Xuemei, Wu Shiliang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Michael Stern v. China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02768
Defendant:
Michael Askew, China Intelligent Lighting and Electronics, Inc., Zhang Hongfeng and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stern
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
