Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61374
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00634
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Siddiq v. Subway 18162, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv61399
Plaintiff: Mohammed Siddiq
Defendant: Subway 18162, Inc. , Mike & Al, Inc , 3666 Subway, Inc and others
Mediator: Neil Flaxman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. SINGH et al
as 3:2011cv01077
Plaintiff: DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant: AMRIK SINGH and FREEHOLD SUBWAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00036
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Meads Subway, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00264
Defendant: Meads Subway, Inc. and Tammy Yu Hsu Meads
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00473
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00108
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?