Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(SS) Kaur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Sukhwinder Kaur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Singh v. Sessions
as 17-729
Petitioner:
Karamjit Singh and Sukhwinder Kaur
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kaur et al v. City of Lodi et al
as 2:2014cv00828
Plaintiff:
Sukhwinder Kaur , Kulbinder Kaur Sohota and Sarabjit Singh Shergill
Defendant:
City of Lodi , City of Lodi Police Department , Mark Helms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Approximately $62,975.48 in U.S. currency seized from Bank of The Sierra account number 720943670
as 1:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $62,975.48 in U.S. currency seized from Bank of The Sierra account number 720943670
Claimant:
Gurdev Singh , Kabal Singh and Sukhwinder Kaur
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Balwinder Singh, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71173
Petitioner:
BALWINDER SINGH and SUKHWINDER KAUR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sukhwinder Kaur v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-71074
Petitioner:
SUKHWINDER KAUR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
