Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Hale v. Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv01535
Plaintiff:
Leon Gregory Hale
Defendant:
Sullivan Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sullivan Correctional Facility
as 13-4487
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent Sullivan Correctional Facility
Paul Ruine v. Senkowski
as 13-1527
Petitioner:
Paul Ruine
Respondent:
James J. Walsh, Sullivan Correctional Facility, Fallsburg, New York
Fleming v. Griffin
as 13-1378
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudy Fleming
Respondent - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Sorodsky v. US Attorney
as 12-4608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michail Sorodsky and Beverly Sorodsky
Defendant:
Shulamit Neuman, Assistant Attorney General, Irwin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Michell Maerov, Assistant Attorney General and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United Stats Attorney, Andrew Cuomo, New York State Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman and others
Encarnacion v. Goord
as 12-3953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant - Appellee:
David Rock, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, Donald Selsky, Director, Special Housing Unit, Glenn Goord, Commissioner, Department of Correctional Service and others
Sorodsky et al v. US Attorney et al
as 1:2012cv04420
Defendant:
Justice Betsy Barros, Ellen Bieben, Anthony Bocola and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Sorodsky and Michail Sorodsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bramble v. Griffin
as 12-3322
Petitioner - Appellant:
Anton Bramble
Respondent - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Gonzalez v. Kuhlman
as 12-2711
Petitioner:
Santos Gonzalez
Respondent:
Robert Kuhlman, Superintendent of the Sullivan Correctional Facility
Pepe v. Walsh
as 12-2530
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vincent Pepe
Respondent - Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent, Sullivan Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
