Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Abney v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2023cv10082
Plaintiff:
Devon Terrell Abney
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Donald R. Parker, Nicole J. Sumpter and others
United States of America v. Firearms and Associated Ammunition Seized from a Residence, Ten
as 1:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ten (10) Firearms and Associated Ammunition Seized From A Residence Located On Sumpter Street, Lansing, Michigan, On or About August 3, 2021 and Firearms and Associated Ammunition Seized from a Residence, Ten
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beavers et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11341
Plaintiff:
Kathy Tucker, Sara Nichols, William Barton and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Sumpter v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2019cv11356
Petitioner:
Nelson Sumpter
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Sears et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11298
Plaintiff:
Michael Sears , Richard Serrels , Paulette Shaw and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14872
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sumpter v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2014cv14769
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sumpter
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Benny N. Napolean, Wayne County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardison IV v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2013cv11345
Plaintiff:
Terry Hardison IV
Defendant:
Detroit, City of , Timothy Sumpter and Rhonda Moore
Sumpter v. Atkins et al
as 2:2012cv13958
Plaintiff:
Omar Sumpter
Defendant:
Marilyn E. Atkins , Abed Hammoud and Allen Cox, IV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
