Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Erik Mishiyev v. YouTube, LLC, et al
as 24-14050
Defendant:
YOUTUBE, LLC and SUNDAR PICHAI
Plaintiff:
ERIK MISHIYEV
Mishiyev v. Youtube LLC et al
as 3:2024cv08661
Defendant:
Sundar Pichai and YouTube LLC
Plaintiff:
Erik Mishiyev
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Mishiyev v. Youtube LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02675
Defendant:
Sundar Pichai and Youtube LLC
Plaintiff:
Erik Mishiyev
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
California Crane School, Inc. v. Google LLC, et al.
as 24-4604
Defendant:
ERIC SCHMIDT, SUNDAR PICHAI, APPLE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA CRANE SCHOOL, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. One IA Potters House Church et al
as 2:2024cv04076
Defendant:
Celebrity Helicopters Inc., George Town, Penang, St. Philip Neri Catholic Church and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patel v. Alphabet Inc., et al.
as 24-2530
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A Governmental Entity and others
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raj K. Patel and Raj Patel
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Patel v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., XXVI Holdings Inc., Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTRO-MOTA v. PICHAI, ET AL
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
SUNDAR PICHAI and ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
