Cases 31 - 40 of 217
Smith v. US
as 21-1431
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIU YU CHANG, JOSEPH A. GARCIA, JEAN-FRANCOIS BONNETE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LEE v. LYONS et al
as 2:2020cv14245
Defendant:
Steven Pfefer, Carey Lyons and David Singh
Plaintiff:
Member Sung Youn Lee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv06003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
COZZENS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv02798
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
BLAKE COZZENS
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Kevin Adams v. Mark Elrich
as 20-1988
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN PATRICK MORRISSEY, Chief Judge District Court Headquarters Maryland Judicial Center, in his official and or non-official capacity, JASON CAREW, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, in his official and non-official capacity, JOHN HAFER, Parole and Probation in his official and or non-official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
MOLINO v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01931
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CONSULATE, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MOLINO
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CELLEROS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv01545
Defendant:
U.S. CONSULATE, MANILA, PHILIPPINES, MICHAEL POMPEO, CHAD WOLF and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CELLEROS
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
