Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roshan v. Sunquist et al
as 3:2024cv02789
Plaintiff:
Peyman Roshan
Defendant:
Chika Sunquist and Douglas McCauley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Hunt v. Frank Sunquist, et al
as 19-4264
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK ASHCRAFT and FRANK SUNQUIST
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE J. HUNT
Rashid K. Khalfani v. California Department of Real Estate et al
as 2:2019cv02962
Plaintiff:
Rashid K. Khalfani and R. K. Khalfani
Defendant:
Amelia Vetrone, California Department of Real Estate and Chika Sunquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Obataiye-Allah v. Sunquist et al
as 6:2019cv00136
Defendant:
G. Laney, Lambert, J. Hyde and others
Plaintiff:
Uhuru'Sekou Kamara Ajani Obataiye-Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Sunquist et al
as 1:2017cv01444
Defendant:
Mark Ashcraft and Frank Sunquist
Plaintiff:
Andre J. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
Howard Porter Fisher
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Bill Haslam, Metropolitan Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sunquist v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv05031
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leroy Sunquist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fitzpatrick v. Board of County Commissioners of Curry County, et al
as 1:2013cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Fitzpatrick
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Curry County, Lance Pyle, Carlos Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
TAYLOR v. HAYMAN et al
as 2:2010cv04079
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM TAYLOR
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HAYMAN, DONALD MEE, CINDY SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
