Cases 1 - 8 of 8
David Pierce et al v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
as 5:2021cv00234
Plaintiff:
Desiree Pierce, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Nicolette Pierce and others
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Pierce et al v. Abanoob Abdel-Malak
as 5:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Breanna Pierce, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Nicolette Pierce and others
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of California et al v. Abdel-Malak
as 3:2020cv01426
Plaintiff:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, County of Riverside, State of California and others
Defendant:
Abanoob Abdel-Malak
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Jorge Anderson-El, et al v. Michael Zeff, et al
as 19-56321
Defendant / Appellee:
STANLEY MIDDLEMAN, Individual, DBA Freedom Mortgage, GRAHAM HOLMES, Individual, DBA Reviron Realty, BRADLEY OLPIN SNELL, Individual, DBA Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
KING ABDUL MUMIN-EL and JOYCE TRUMPET
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORGE ANDERSON-EL
Jorge Anderson-El et al v. Michael D Zeff et al
as 5:2019cv01777
Plaintiff:
King Abdul Mumin-El, Jorge Anderson-El and Joyce Trumpet
Defendant:
Jeff Tcharavov, Stanley Middleman, Bradley Olpin Snell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Judith E. Owens et al v. Debra Hurst et al
as 5:2016cv02540
Defendant:
Elena Maria Boeva, Kelley Jean Bustos, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Drew McMaster, Shelly McMaster and Judith E Owens
Michael Galles et al v. Hortense Granderson et al
as 5:2014cv01281
Defendant:
David M Brown, County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Galles and Christina McManus
Salvador Hurtado Garcia v. Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside
as 5:2012cv00847
Petitioner:
Salvador Hurtado Garcia
Respondent:
Gary S Sandor
People Of The State Of California, Real Party In Interest:
Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
