Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Hugunin v. Idaho, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Harvey William Hugunin
Defendant:
Idaho, State of, Idaho Supreme Court, Idaho State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 5:2023cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Attorney Kara Pratt, Texas Supreme Court, Texas Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Morris Thompson, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Fiorentino v. Hillsborough County, Florida et al
as 5:2023cv05012
Plaintiff:
Shane Fiorentino
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Florida, The Supreme Court of Florida and The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jackey Dalton
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01061
Plaintiff:
John Wright
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Bobby Barbwire Law
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Askew v. Arnold et al
as 3:2021cv01039
Plaintiff:
Darrell Askew
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kursh v. Arnold et al
as 4:2021cv01024
Plaintiff:
Kilo Gee Kursh
Defendant:
Gary M Arnold, Clarence Thomas, Lavenski Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
