Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jones v. Michelotti et al
as 8:2018cv03036
Defendant:
FNU Brown, Erik R. Matheney, Kevin McLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Jones, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Krocka v. Hillsborough County Sheriff's, et al
as 17-10674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT JAMES KROCKA
Defendant - Appellee:
HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY-TAMPA DIVISION and others
Harris v. United States et al
as 8:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
Delexsia Harris
Defendant:
United States and Susan C. Bucklew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Krocka v. Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2016cv02295
Plaintiff:
Vincent J. Krocka
Defendant:
Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the United States Attorney-Tampa Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 7:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 6:2015cv00924
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 3:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
