Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Abraugh v. Altimus et al
as 5:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Karen Abraugh
Defendant:
JESSICA FARRINGTON, BRADLEY VASSAR, Julian C Whittington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bohannan v. Causey et al
as 5:2019cv01476
Plaintiff:
Brendan D Bohannan
Defendant:
Nurse Lanier, Quinton Black, L Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobb v. Whittington et al
as 5:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Billy Murrell Cobb
Defendant:
Julian Whittington, Jason Burns and Susan Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tucker et al
as 5:2015cv01884
Plaintiff:
Keith Leonard Rogers
Defendant:
Susan Tucker, Jason Burns, Liton Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeder v. Bossier Parish et al
as 5:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
Walter P Reeder
Defendant:
Bossier Parish, Dept of Corrections, Steve Hoyle Treatment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wenk v. Bossier et al
as 5:2012cv02847
Plaintiff:
Jason Wenk
Defendant:
Parish of Bossier, Julian Whittington, Rod Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Leblanc et al
as 5:2012cv02666
Plaintiff:
Derrick K Barber
Defendant:
James Leblanc, Jerry Goodwin, Susan Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dannie Hayward v. Forcht Wade Correctional Ctr, et al
as 12-30321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNIE R. HAYWARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
FORCHT WADE CORRECTIONAL CENTER COLT PARMER, CORODNEY SPECKS, CLARENCE WASHINGTON and others
Brian Chisholm v. Anthony Batson, et al
as 10-30838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN K. CHISHOLM
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY BATSON, JERRY GOODWIN, SUSAN TUCKER and others
Sanders v. Goodwin et al
as 5:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
Mark S Sanders
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin, Anthony Batson, Susan Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
