Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff: Kinley Macdonald
Defendant: Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff: Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant: Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10146
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mogavero v. Sherwood et al
as 1:2022cv10505
Plaintiff: Donna Marie Mogavero
Defendant: Edward R. Sherwood and Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. doing business as Swift-Transportation Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Swift Leak v. Massachusetts Housing et al
as 1:2021cv11492
Plaintiff: Sonya Swift Leak
Defendant: Massachusetts Housing, Reem Property, LLC. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11472
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Raitt v. Altec, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv12455
Plaintiff: John Raitt
Defendant: Altec, Inc. and Derrick Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Swift v. Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
as 1:2016cv12013
Plaintiff: Charles Swift
Defendant: Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swift v. Spatafore
as 1:2016cv10570
Plaintiff: Charles Swift
Defendant: Anthony Spatafore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swift Construction LLC v. Benaka Inc et al
as 1:2015cv13108
Plaintiff: Swift Construction LLC
Defendant: Benaka, Inc. and Arch Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?