Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Swift v. McHugh
as 8:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Taylor McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swift v. Nebraska CPS et al
as 8:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Nebraska CPS and Taylor McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In Re: Cattle and Beef Antitrust Litigation
as 8:2023cv00153
Respondent:
Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
Petitioner:
JBS Packerland, Inc., JBS S.A., JBS USA Food Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
as 8:2023cv00152
Respondent:
Nebraska Beef, Ltd.
Petitioner:
JBS USA Food Company, JBS S.A., Swift Beef Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Swift v. U.S.A.A. Insurance
as 8:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
U.S.A.A. Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Swift v. Cooper et al
as 8:2020cv00445
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Randall, Patrick Cooper and Fraser Stryker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Central Kentucky Agricultural Credit Association v. Sebade et al
as 8:2020cv00398
Defendant:
Rick Sebade, Swift Beef Company and Rick Sebade individually and d/b/a Sebade Feed Yards doing business as Sebade Feed Yards
Plaintiff:
Central Kentucky Agricultural Credit Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swift v. Warden of the Douglas County Correction Center
as 8:2020cv00354
Respondent:
Warden of the Douglas County Correction Center
Petitioner:
Ingerat Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
