Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ISON v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
DAVID ISON
Defendant:
W.V.C.F., I.D.O.C., PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOTEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOOTEN
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, JACK HENDRIX, JERRY SYNDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. WELLINGTON et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
THOMAS WELLINGTON, WILMORE, CARPETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
WARDEN, OII SUPERVISOR HERE AT W.V.C.F, CLASSIFICATION SUPERVISOR HERE AT W.V.C.F and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING et al v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEVON STERLING
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LENOIR v. JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2022cv00504
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE LENOIR
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY JAIL, QUALITY 360 MEDICAL, MELINDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slater v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Cortrez D Slater
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Loretta H Rush, Tom Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flournoy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Flournoy
Defendant:
Warden Sproul, C. Davis, Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PARKER v. FLOWERS et al
as 1:2021cv01442
Defendant:
SHATRESE M. FLOWERS and JAMES SYNDER
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Flowers et al
as 1:2021cv00167
Defendant:
James Synder and Shatrese M Flowers
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
