Cases 31 - 40 of 2,219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Tillman v. Tillman et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Marialina T. Tillman
Defendant:
Bryant T. Tillman, Chelsa Hehl, Allyson Valdivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robinson v. AT&T Co Owns Direct TV with Equity firm TPG Inc.
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Vickie Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
AT&T Co Owns Direct TV with Equity firm TPG Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Deans v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Donshea O'Niess Deans
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Gregory L. Holloway, Warden Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dedes v. Paige et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Christos D. Dedes
Defendant:
Rosewell Paige, John H. O'Brion, Jr., James Watson Morris, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ackiss v. Stumpf
as 7:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Kahlyl Ackiss
Defendant:
T. Stumpf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blagmon v. Hanover County
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Blagmon
Defendant:
Hanover County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blagmon
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael T Blagmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Casey et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jasmone Kausvas Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Joseph P. Casey, Colonel Jeffrey S. Katz, S.M. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Shabazz v. Scarantino
as 7:2024cv00094
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
